Archbishop Peter Sartain could have publicly disclosed the first time
someone reported janitor Chuck Siddon’s alleged abuse. He could have
done so the first time an abuse report against Siddon was deemed
“credible.” He could have done so the first time the archdiocese was
sued because of Siddon’s alleged crimes. He could have done so when the
archdiocese first paid off one of Siddon’s alleged victims.
Instead, at every juncture, Sartain opts for secrecy over openness, until the bitter end. And even then, instead of providing the full truth, he provides self-serving “spin.”
http://www.snapnetwork.org/wa_seattle_catholic_abuse_secrecy_continues_snap_says
Instead, at every juncture, Sartain opts for secrecy over openness, until the bitter end. And even then, instead of providing the full truth, he provides self-serving “spin.”
http://www.snapnetwork.org/wa_seattle_catholic_abuse_secrecy_continues_snap_says